Re: SPI bug.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SPI bug.
Date: 2005-05-01 15:29:42
Message-ID: 24529.1114961382@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> The reason the API types should use "long" is that the underlying
> executor APIs (e.g. ExecutorRun()) use "long". It might be a good idea
> to change the executor stuff to use int64s

No, it would not. There is a potential performance cost ("long" should
have at least acceptable performance on all machines, "long long" is
another story) and there is no demonstrated need.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-05-01 15:37:47 Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Previous Message Dennis Bjorklund 2005-05-01 14:56:13 Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1