From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Yang Zhang <yanghatespam(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jov <amutu(at)amutu(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Basic question on recovery and disk snapshotting |
Date: | 2013-04-27 18:13:18 |
Message-ID: | 245.1367086398@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Yang Zhang <yanghatespam(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> My question really boils down to: if we're interested in using COW
> snapshotting (a common feature of modern filesystems and hosting
> environments), would we necessarily need to ensure the data and
> pg_xlog are on the same snapshotted volume?
Yeah, I think so. It's possible to imagine schemes that would let
a WAL-snapshot-shortly-after-the-data-snapshot work, but you would
(at least) need to disable WAL file recycling, which there's no
provision for at the moment.
The usual approach is to use a COW snapshot only for making a base
backup of the data area, and rely on WAL streaming/archiving to copy
the WAL.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2013-04-27 18:55:05 | Re: Basic question on recovery and disk snapshotting |
Previous Message | Yang Zhang | 2013-04-27 17:40:20 | Re: Basic question on recovery and disk snapshotting |