Re: PQConnectPoll, connect(2), EWOULDBLOCK and somaxconn

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PQConnectPoll, connect(2), EWOULDBLOCK and somaxconn
Date: 2013-06-27 16:42:47
Message-ID: 24398.1372351367@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2013-06-26 20:07:40 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I still want to delete the test for SOCK_ERRNO == 0. I traced that back
>> to commit da9501bddb42222dc33c031b1db6ce2133bcee7b, but I can't find
>> anything in the mailing list archives to explain that. I have an
>> inquiry in to Jan to see if he can remember the reason ...

> That looks strange, yes.

Committed that way. We can always undo it if Jan can defend the logic.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-06-27 16:47:49 Re: MD5 aggregate
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2013-06-27 16:42:06 Re: [PATCH] add --progress option to pgbench (submission 3)