| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Closing some 8.4 open items |
| Date: | 2009-04-10 16:16:22 |
| Message-ID: | 24384.1239380182@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:30:30AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Perhaps more to the point: the previous round of discussion about
>> this already rejected the idea of treating window functions as a
>> category fundamentally separate from plain functions --- that is, we
>> are not following the "aggregate" model of having separate commands
>> for aggregate functions.
> I hadn't seen any such a consensus.
We do not have CREATE WINDOW FUNCTION, DROP WINDOW FUNCTION, ALTER
WINDOW FUNCTION, etc. If psql uses \dw it will be presenting a
different world view than exists at the SQL level.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2009-04-10 16:16:40 | WIP: to_char, support for EEEE format |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2009-04-10 15:58:51 | Re: Windows installation service |