| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, 本家pgsql-hackersについて日本語で議論するML <hackers-jp(at)ml(dot)postgresql(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [hackers-jp: 219] Re: postgresql-8.1.4文字セットサポート |
| Date: | 2006-07-28 15:20:45 |
| Message-ID: | 24384.1154100045@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote:
> Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net> writes:
>> Just to confirm, it does look like there's a discrepancy between what
>> is in the documentation and the actual behavior of the server. The
>> documentation indicates that SJIS is a valid server encoding:
> This is a documentation error --- SJIS is certainly not a valid server
> encoding (it's not 8-bit-safe). Will fix --- thanks for pointing it out.
Actually, table 21-2 does say that SJIS isn't supported as a server
encoding, but the text at the top of the page (before table 21-1) is
pretty misleading --- it implies that every character set we have
is allowed as a server-side encoding. I'm going to change that text,
and also add a column to table 21-1 marking the supported server
encodings.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-07-28 15:28:20 | Re: The vacuum-ignore-vacuum patch |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-28 15:09:11 | Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] [Fwd: RE: Build farm on Windows] |