From: | "Lars Ewald (web(dot)de)" <l(dot)ewald-web(at)lars-ewald(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Rainer Tammer <pgsql(at)spg(dot)schulergroup(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Fwd: Re: Compile fails on AIX 6.1 |
Date: | 2014-08-01 18:00:10 |
Message-ID: | 243700781.29477.1406916010739.open-xchange@oxbaltgw56.schlund.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Hello Rainer,
> What PostgreSQl exact version are you trying to compile?
9.3.4
Bye,
Lars
> Rainer Tammer <pgsql(at)spg(dot)schulergroup(dot)com> hat am 28. Juli 2014 um 07:58
> geschrieben:
>
>
> Hello,
> What PostgreSQl exact version are you trying to compile?
> I like to test this with the IBM compiler.
>
> Bye
> Rainer
>
> On 26.07.2014 00:32, Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Lars Ewald (web.de)" <l(dot)ewald-web(at)lars-ewald(dot)de> writes:
> >> Hello Tom,
> >> today I was able to do some tests compiling Postgres on our AIX machine.
> >> And...it worked! :-) Configuring without spinlocks and readline worked fine
> >> for
> >> me and did not abort after compiling xlog.o/xlog.c.
> >> Any ideas why it does not work with spinlocks?
> > Well, spinlocks are what uses the assembler code that you're having
> > trouble with.
> >
> > Note that while you can build with --disable-spinlocks, performance is
> > not likely to be acceptable. We don't really consider a platform
> > supported unless it's got working spinlocks.
> >
> > regards, tom lane
> >
> >
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | danghuu.ken | 2014-08-01 18:20:10 | BUG #11108: Missing Binaries |
Previous Message | Lars Ewald (web.de) | 2014-08-01 17:59:23 | Re: Fwd: Re: Compile fails on AIX 6.1 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fabien | 2014-08-01 18:46:03 | add modulo (%) operator to pgbench |
Previous Message | Lars Ewald (web.de) | 2014-08-01 17:59:23 | Re: Fwd: Re: Compile fails on AIX 6.1 |