From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: Including kerberos realm |
Date: | 2009-01-02 15:20:20 |
Message-ID: | 24355.1230909620@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Not that this affects me in any way, but should there be a GUC variable
>> to set the default behavior system-wide?
> I thought about that, but I don't want to add extra gucs without a good
> reason. You'd typically not have very many different lines in pg_hba for
> this, and just duplicating the parameter there would be ok I think.
> I'd rather move more of the krb parameters to be *just* in pg_hba.conf,
> but for now I left those in postgresql.conf as fallbacks..
If you think those parameters would make more sense in pg_hba.conf,
let's just move them and be done with it. There has never been any
intention that administrator-only GUCs would be promised compatible
across versions. And the GUC mechanism is really rather a lot of
overhead compared to options on a pg_hba line ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-01-02 15:33:25 | Re: posix_fadvise v22 |
Previous Message | Stephen R. van den Berg | 2009-01-02 14:57:46 | Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4? |