From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Mark Mielke <mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets |
Date: | 2008-01-15 16:06:41 |
Message-ID: | 24355.1200413201@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> Just for reference: who is it we're worried will check the old
> location? Any client using libpq will use the protected directory
> built into that.
Only if it's using the same copy of libpq that was built with the
server. Also, there are non-libpq-based client implementations out
there, or at least used to be.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-01-15 16:12:25 | Re: Declarative partitioning grammar |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-01-15 15:55:02 | Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-01-15 16:12:16 | Re: Forgot to dump old data before re-installing machine |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-01-15 15:55:02 | Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets |