Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Mark Mielke <mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets
Date: 2008-01-15 16:06:41
Message-ID: 24355.1200413201@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> Just for reference: who is it we're worried will check the old
> location? Any client using libpq will use the protected directory
> built into that.

Only if it's using the same copy of libpq that was built with the
server. Also, there are non-libpq-based client implementations out
there, or at least used to be.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2008-01-15 16:12:25 Re: Declarative partitioning grammar
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-01-15 15:55:02 Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-01-15 16:12:16 Re: Forgot to dump old data before re-installing machine
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-01-15 15:55:02 Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets