From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "szyjek9302(at)gmail(dot)com" <szyjek9302(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #18281: Superuser can rename the schema with the prefix "pg_" (Applies to all versions of postgresql) |
Date: | 2024-01-10 16:45:29 |
Message-ID: | 2434705.1704905129@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
"David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wednesday, January 10, 2024, PG Bug reporting form <
> noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>> I renamed the schema pg_toast
>> moja=# alter schema pg_toast rename to x_pg_toast
>> moja-# ;
>> ALTER SCHEMA
>> and can't undo it because :
>> moja=# alter schema x_pg_toast rename to pg_toast;
>> ERROR: unacceptable schema name "pg_toast"
>> DETAIL: The prefix "pg_" is reserved for system schemas.
>>
>> I think this is a serious problem that should be fixed by developers. The
>> superuser should not be able to rename system schemas.
> This isn’t a bug - there is very little effort spent on trying to prevent
> the superuser from doing stuff, even stuff that directly breaks their
> system.
Indeed. Try something like "delete from pg_proc;" (not in a database
you want to keep!). This is not significantly different from the fact
that root privilege in Unix allows you to do unrecoverable stuff like
"rm -rf /". The cost/benefit ratio just isn't there for trying to
put training wheels on root, or on superusers.
> I do agree that there seems to be some room for improvement here, at least
> as far as recovering from the initial bad decision goes.
A manual update on pg_namespace.nspname would be enough for getting
out of this particular problem.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexander Lakhin | 2024-01-10 18:00:01 | Re: BUG #17798: Incorrect memory access occurs when using BEFORE ROW UPDATE trigger |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2024-01-10 15:11:49 | Re: BUG #18279: Duplicate key violation and Deadlock when using ON CONFLICT/DO UPDATE with multiple unique indexes |