From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Per-function search_path => per-function GUC settings |
Date: | 2007-09-01 19:03:14 |
Message-ID: | 24343.1188673394@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> writes:
> Can we also provide syntax which would be equivalent to setting "var"
> for the function to be whatever the current value happens to be when the
> ALTER FUNCTION is run? Possible syntax might be something like:
> ALTER FUNCTION func(args) SET var TO CURRENT;
Hmmm ... that's certainly do-able, though I'm not sure how much it helps
the use-case you suggest. The search path still has to be set at the
top of the module script, no?
However, I like an explicit option of this sort a lot better than the
automatic version Greg was suggesting ... I'm willing to do it if people
want it.
One problem is that we'd have to make CURRENT a reserved word to make it
work exactly like that. Can anyone think of a variant syntax that
doesn't need a new reserved word?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-09-01 19:12:44 | Re: Per-function search_path => per-function GUC settings |
Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2007-09-01 18:40:04 | Re: Per-function search_path => per-function GUC settings |