Re: roundoff problem in time datatype

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org>
Cc: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: roundoff problem in time datatype
Date: 2005-09-26 14:28:31
Message-ID: 24340.1127744911@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org> writes:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
>> No, I think the usual notation for a leap-second is '23:59:60'.
>> We do allow 60 in the seconds field for this purpose.

> Yes, and it can go up to 23:59:60.999999 (depending on how many fractional
> seconds one want).

That's an urban legend. There never have been, and never will be, two
leap seconds instituted in the same minute. We really should reject
anything larger than '23:59:60'.

> One "solution" is to round '23:59:59.9'::time(0) up to '00:00:00'.

7.2 did that, and we concluded it was broken.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dennis Bjorklund 2005-09-26 14:40:03 Re: roundoff problem in time datatype
Previous Message Dennis Bjorklund 2005-09-26 14:16:09 Re: roundoff problem in time datatype

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dennis Bjorklund 2005-09-26 14:40:03 Re: roundoff problem in time datatype
Previous Message Dennis Bjorklund 2005-09-26 14:16:09 Re: roundoff problem in time datatype