From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tiago Wright <tiagowright(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Indexed views? |
Date: | 2004-09-07 02:40:10 |
Message-ID: | 24334.1094524810@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tiago Wright <tiagowright(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> For example, consider the view
> CREATE VIEW vw_lot AS
> SELECTproductid,lotid,parentlotid,lottype,lotname,productname
> FROMlot
> NATURALJOINproduct;
> where productname is in the product table, and lotname in the lot
> table. I would be interested in creating an index such as
> CREATE INDEX ix_vw_lot ON vw_lot (lotname, productname);
What purpose would this serve that indexes on the separate tables
wouldn't serve?
> The index would be enough to cover 90% of the queries against
> lot the lot and inventory tables.
This sounds to me like you are suffering from a common misconception.
Postgres cannot answer queries from the contents of indexes alone.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Schuchardt | 2004-09-07 11:08:30 | beta2 and blob's |
Previous Message | Tiago Wright | 2004-09-07 02:13:12 | Re: Indexed views? |