Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> We have five different expected files for the int2 and int4 tests because
> every system has a different idea on what to print for ERANGE. I'm about
> to add another version. Would it make more sense to hard code one wording
> and not use strerror here?
Kinda sounds like the path of least resistance, doesn't it? I assume
you'd do the substitution inside elog(), so it's consistent for all
places that might report ERANGE via %m ?
regards, tom lane