| From: | "Thomas F(dot) O'Connell" <tf(at)o(dot)ptimized(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto |
| Date: | 2007-02-06 18:34:17 |
| Message-ID: | 2432ED1B-2F0F-4333-8022-7083EFCF5989@o.ptimized.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Feb 6, 12:27 pm, t(dot)(dot)(dot)(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane) wrote:
> As per numerous reports this morning, PG 8.2.2 and 8.1.7 both fail on
> fairly simple scenarios involving typmod-bearing columns (varchar,
> numeric, etc) with check constraints or functional indexes (and maybe
> other cases too, but those are the ones reported so far). I have not
> been able to reproduce the failures in 8.0 but I think it may have
the
> same issue in a weaker form. We need a quick re-release I'm afraid.
Should the existing source and binaries be pulled in the meantime?
--
Thomas F. O'Connell
optimizing modern web applications
: for search engines, for usability, and for performance :
http://o.ptimized.com/
615-260-0005
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-02-06 18:40:41 | Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto |
| Previous Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2007-02-06 18:33:40 | Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto |