From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_dump additional options for performance |
Date: | 2008-07-26 17:43:06 |
Message-ID: | 24327.1217094186@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
>> This argument is nonsense. The typical usage of this capability, IMHO,
>> will be
>>
>> pg_dump -Fc >whole.dump
>> pg_restore --schema-before-data whole.dump >before.sql
>> pg_restore --data-only whole.dump >data.sql
>> pg_restore --schema-after-data whole.dump >after.sql
>>
>> followed by editing the schema pieces and then loading.
> I dislike, and doubt that I'd use, this approach. At the end of the
> day, it ends up processing the same (very large amount of data) multiple
> times.
Well, that's easily avoided: just replace the third step by restoring
directly to the target database.
pg_restore --schema-before-data whole.dump >before.sql
edit before.sql
pg_restore --schema-after-data whole.dump >after.sql
edit after.sql
psql -f before.sql target_db
pg_restore --data-only -d target_db whole.dump
psql -f after.sql target_db
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-07-26 17:44:16 | Re: pg_dump(all) library |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-07-26 17:20:48 | Re: Executor question |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-07-26 17:56:14 | Re: pg_dump additional options for performance |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-07-26 16:56:42 | Re: pg_dump additional options for performance |