Re: elog() patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Rod Taylor" <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: elog() patch
Date: 2002-03-04 02:23:40
Message-ID: 24316.1015208620@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Rod Taylor" <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca> writes:
> EXPLAIN would come out as INFO would it not?

If we make it INFO it won't come out at all, at the message level that
a lot of more-advanced users will prefer to use. That's no solution.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2002-03-04 02:49:05 plpgsql nitpicking -- possible TODO item?
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2002-03-04 02:18:09 Re: elog() patch