From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: First steps with 8.3 and autovacuum launcher |
Date: | 2007-10-01 23:35:36 |
Message-ID: | 24302.1191281736@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
[ on further thought ]
"Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> writes:
>> ... solving the problem
>> for analyze is a nice piece of low-hanging fruit that solves an
>> immediate problem that has been reported.
Actually, if you wanted a low-hanging solution to that, it would
probably be to revert this 8.2 patch:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2006-09/msg00284.php
We did that because people were complaining of unexpected failures in
manual ANALYZEs, but perhaps the cure is worse than the disease.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-10-01 23:43:45 | Re: First steps with 8.3 and autovacuum launcher |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-10-01 23:28:02 | Re: First steps with 8.3 and autovacuum launcher |