Re: Error handling for ShmemInitStruct and ShmemInitHash

"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> none of the other half are printing messages that are more useful
>> than "out of shared memory" (which isn't even necessarily
>> correct).

> I think the messages in the locking area are a bit more useful than
> "out of shared memory", but it would be trivial to build the
> equivalent message in the ShmemInitHash function, based on the first
> parameter.

Right, I was intending to include the "name" parameter in the messages.
This would actually represent an improvement in message quality in a lot
of the cases.

regards, tom lane