| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Kong Man <kong_mansatiansin(at)hotmail(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: pg_restore 14 skips ACL COLUMN when --schema is used | 
| Date: | 2023-07-29 00:24:00 | 
| Message-ID: | 2427882.1690590240@sss.pgh.pa.us | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs | 
Kong Man <kong_mansatiansin(at)hotmail(dot)com> writes:
> pg_restore --schema in our script used to work well against pg_restore 10.  Now that we are on PostgreSQL 14.  pg_restore 14 skips ACL COLUMN, but not ACL TABLE, when --schema is used.
That's not the behavior I'm seeing.  Would you mind providing a
*complete* reproducer, not some fragments?
The behavior I'm seeing is that neither a TABLE nor a COLUMN ACL
will be restored, because (since v11) ACLs are restored only
if their table is restored, and the --use-list option you are
using excludes the table.
We could perhaps imagine special-casing that, but I think it would be
a wart, because for every other kind of object --use-list can only
filter stuff out, not filter it in.  (That is, if you are using
--use-list along with other selectivity options, an object must pass
both restrictions to be output.  I don't want to make --use-list
override other rules just for ACLs.)
It would be interesting to see your actual use-case, because
I suspect you may be doing something that there's a better way
to do now.  What set of objects are you trying to extract?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christian Vallières | 2023-07-29 14:45:46 | Re: BUG #18042: Query planner favor index corresponding to a order by with a limit even when there is a where | 
| Previous Message | Kong Man | 2023-07-28 22:01:19 | pg_restore 14 skips ACL COLUMN when --schema is used |