Re: Block-level CRC checks

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Jaime Casanova" <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, "Greg Stark" <greg(dot)stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Pg Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Block-level CRC checks
Date: 2008-12-15 16:29:52
Message-ID: 2426.1229358592@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Jonah H. Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> Feature freeze is not the time to be looking for new ideas. I suggest
>> we save this for 8.5.

> Well, we may not need a new idea.

We don't really have an acceptable solution for the conflict with hint
bit behavior. The shutdown issue is minor, agreed, but that's not the
stumbling block.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-12-15 16:30:59 Re: Block-level CRC checks
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2008-12-15 16:28:20 Re: rules regression test failed on mingw