| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | cedric(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Makefiles don't seem to remember to rebuild everything anymore |
| Date: | 2012-12-15 16:23:36 |
| Message-ID: | 24187.1355588616@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
=?iso-8859-15?q?C=E9dric_Villemain?= <cedric(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Le vendredi 14 dcembre 2012 23:02:11, Tom Lane a crit :
>> $ rm gram.o
>> rm: remove regular file `gram.o'? y
>> $ make
>> make: Nothing to be done for `all'.
>>
>> WTF?
> A previous patch changed the ".SECONDARY" from an if() section to the main
> section of src/Makefile.global.in,
Hm. I should have made clear that this isn't specific to gram.o ---
I also tried "rm analyze.o" and that didn't trigger any action either.
So it doesn't seem to be a case of the bison rule chain being
specifically at fault.
I do suspect that this was triggered by some fairly recent makefile
change, though, because I don't recall having seen anything as odd
as this until recently.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-12-15 16:45:36 | Re: Set visibility map bit after HOT prune |
| Previous Message | Erik Rijkers | 2012-12-15 13:24:05 | Re: small pg_basebackup display bug |