| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Clemmons <glassresistor(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Faster CREATE DATABASE by delaying fsync (was 8.4.1 ubuntu karmic slow createdb) |
| Date: | 2010-02-07 16:24:00 |
| Message-ID: | 24184.1265559840@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> This is turning into yet another one of those situations where something
> simple and useful is being killed by trying to generalize it way more
> than it needs to be, given its current goals and its lack of external
> interfaces. There's no catversion bump or API breakage to hinder future
> refactoring if this isn't optimally designed internally from day one.
I agree that it's too late in the cycle for any major redesign of the
patch. But is it too much to ask to use a less confusing name for the
function?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joachim Wieland | 2010-02-07 16:32:12 | Re: Listen / Notify - what to do when the queue is full |
| Previous Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2010-02-07 14:56:32 | Re: damage control mode |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-02-07 18:23:10 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Faster CREATE DATABASE by delaying fsync (was 8.4.1 ubuntu karmic slow createdb) |
| Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2010-02-07 09:23:14 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Faster CREATE DATABASE by delaying fsync (was 8.4.1 ubuntu karmic slow createdb) |