| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: From latin9 to sql_ascii?? |
| Date: | 2004-12-17 21:21:49 |
| Message-ID: | 24173.1103318509@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-patches |
Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> Why it not work on Latin9,
>> Probably because it hasn't got a table for Latin9.
>>
>> Feel free to contribute one --- see
>> src/backend/utils/adt/ascii.c.
> This page shows the differences between Latin1 &
> Latin9:
> http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/latin9.html
> The diffs are:
> 164: the euro symbol. (sql_ascii = 'E')???
> 166: an S with a symbol above (sql_ascii = 'S')
> 168: the same but lower case (sql_ascii = 's')
> 180: an Z with a symbol above (sql_ascii = 'Z')
> 184: the same but lower case (sql_ascii = 'z')
> 188: it's an O merge with an E (sql_ascii = '')???
> 189: the same but lower case (sql_ascii = '')???
> 190: an Y with a 2 points above (sql_ascii = 'Y')
> Comments?
Works for me. Anyone feel this is too big a change to push into 8.0?
Strictly speaking it's a new feature, but it sure looks harmless from
here.
Personally I'd say that the euro symbol should map to ' ' not 'E',
but am not set on that.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Artur Pietruk | 2004-12-17 22:07:42 | PostgreSQL internals and implementation of transactions |
| Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2004-12-17 21:03:27 | Re: From latin9 to sql_ascii?? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-12-17 22:09:17 | Re: From latin9 to sql_ascii?? |
| Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2004-12-17 21:03:27 | Re: From latin9 to sql_ascii?? |