Re: Advise on dropping TEMP table/schema for my use case

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: gnanam(at)zoniac(dot)com, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Advise on dropping TEMP table/schema for my use case
Date: 2011-03-09 15:27:58
Message-ID: 24163.1299684478@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Gnanakumar <gnanam(at)zoniac(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> So, now we've decided to either DROP TABLE pg_temp_xx.FOO or DROP SCHEMA
>> pg_temp_xx explicitly just before closing the connection (after step 3 and
>> before step 4), so that it'll not be visible for the next database
>> connection request. My question is, which one of the option is recommended
>> and why?

> Why can't you just do:
> DROP TABLE FOO;

Or if you don't want to remember what you've created, update to 8.3+
so you can use DISCARD? (Or really, so that pg_pool can use DISCARD
... it should be the connection pooler's responsibility to ensure that
you get a clean-looking session.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-03-09 15:31:56 Re: [GENERAL] FW: backup using pg_dump postgreSQL 8.3.8
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2011-03-09 15:27:48 Re: [GENERAL] FW: backup using pg_dump postgreSQL 8.3.8