From: | db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Money type todos? |
Date: | 2007-03-21 08:08:44 |
Message-ID: | 2413.192.121.104.112.1174464524.squirrel@zigo.dhs.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org> writes:
>> What is the reason to keep it?
>
> The words-of-one-syllable answer is that D'Arcy Cain is still willing
> to put work into supporting the money type, and if it still gets the
> job done for him then it probably gets the job done for some other
> people too.
>
> Personally, as a former currency trader I've not seen any proposals on
> this list for a "money" type that I'd consider 100% feature complete.
> The unit-identification part of it is interesting, but pales into
> insignificance compared to the problem that the unit values vary
> constantly
The unit (currency) part is what I don't like about the money type.
To have a fast and size limited fixed point type is something I think is
good. It could very well be called money if we want to or we can give it a
more neutral name.
/Dennis
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2007-03-21 08:46:54 | Re: Effects of GUC settings on automatic replans |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-03-21 06:31:44 | Re: Money type todos? |