From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "korryd(at)enterprisedb(dot)com" <korryd(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PL instrumentation plugin support (i.e. PL/pgSQL debugger infrastructure) |
Date: | 2006-08-08 17:26:25 |
Message-ID: | 24101.1155057985@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
"korryd(at)enterprisedb(dot)com" <korryd(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> The attached patch adds support for loadable instrumentation plugins for
> procedural languages (as discussed at the anniversary summit). It also
> adds plugin support to the PL/pgSQL language handler.
In view of the other patch submitted to support init/fini functions for
shared libraries, I'm inclined to change this one to depend on that;
in particular it seems like we could eliminate the necessity for users
to specify the correct setup-function names. Thoughts?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | korryd@enterprisedb.com | 2006-08-08 17:35:52 | Re: PL instrumentation plugin support (i.e. PL/pgSQL |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2006-08-08 17:24:21 | Re: ecpg test suite |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | korryd@enterprisedb.com | 2006-08-08 17:35:52 | Re: PL instrumentation plugin support (i.e. PL/pgSQL |
Previous Message | ITAGAKI Takahiro | 2006-08-08 03:16:53 | Re: CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2 |