| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "korryd(at)enterprisedb(dot)com" <korryd(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PL instrumentation plugin support (i.e. PL/pgSQL debugger infrastructure) |
| Date: | 2006-08-08 17:26:25 |
| Message-ID: | 24101.1155057985@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
"korryd(at)enterprisedb(dot)com" <korryd(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> The attached patch adds support for loadable instrumentation plugins for
> procedural languages (as discussed at the anniversary summit). It also
> adds plugin support to the PL/pgSQL language handler.
In view of the other patch submitted to support init/fini functions for
shared libraries, I'm inclined to change this one to depend on that;
in particular it seems like we could eliminate the necessity for users
to specify the correct setup-function names. Thoughts?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | korryd@enterprisedb.com | 2006-08-08 17:35:52 | Re: PL instrumentation plugin support (i.e. PL/pgSQL |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2006-08-08 17:24:21 | Re: ecpg test suite |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | korryd@enterprisedb.com | 2006-08-08 17:35:52 | Re: PL instrumentation plugin support (i.e. PL/pgSQL |
| Previous Message | ITAGAKI Takahiro | 2006-08-08 03:16:53 | Re: CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2 |