Re: Postgres Database Disk Usage

From: Carrie Berlin <berlincarrie(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeremiah Bauer <jbauer(at)agristats(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgres Database Disk Usage
Date: 2019-02-08 19:33:53
Message-ID: 240DE3B0-C76B-4A62-9F7E-E37B05A1D8EC@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Do you character varying columns that defined with limit ? Search for pg_toast on google and find the query to determine how much pg_toast you have.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 8, 2019, at 10:47, Jeremiah Bauer <jbauer(at)agristats(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> We have a development database that reports a larger size than the sum of it's relations and I was hoping someone had some insight into this issue. The consumed space is reflected in the size of the data directories PostgreSQL is maintaining on disk, so it's just not a reported size issue.
>
> This is the version of Postgres we are using:
>
> FVDM=# select version();
> version
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> PostgreSQL 9.6.11 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-23), 64-bit
>
> pg_database_size reports this size:
>
> name | owner | size
> ------------+----------+---------
> FVDM | postgres | 43 GB
>
> Running a query to report the total relation size of each schema results in this:
>
> schemaname | pg_size_pretty
> --------------------+----------------
> information_schema | 152 kB
> pg_catalog | 7880 kB
> public | 52 MB
> mart | 439 MB
> (4 rows)
>
> The total size of the relations is less than a gigabyte, but the database is 43GB in size. I've checked each table and there aren't any added indexes, so I'm very confused.
>
> We've run vacuum full and reindex on the database with no reduction in size and a vacuum analyze verbose reports no recoverable rows. I cloned the machine for troubleshooting and even attempted truncating every table in the database to see if that remedied the issue. The only thing that has reclaimed the space is dropping the database and restoring from backup.
>
> What is using the space and how do we reclaim it?
>
> Any help or insight would be greatly appreciated, I'm at a loss as to what is consuming this space.
>
> --
>
> Jeremiah
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this email (and any attachments) is privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this email or the attachments, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this email or any attachment is strictly prohibited and you should not read the message or read or open any attachment. If you have received this email by mistake, please immediately notify the sender and delete it permanently from your system. Agri Stats, Inc. and its subsidiaries will not be held liable to any person or entity resulting from the unintended or unauthorized use of any information contained in this email.

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeremiah Bauer 2019-02-08 19:59:21 Re: [Junk released by User action] Re: [Junk released by User action] Re: [External] Postgres Database Disk Usage
Previous Message Mariel Cherkassky 2019-02-08 19:33:51 Re: [Junk released by User action] Re: [External] Postgres Database Disk Usage