Re: BUG #14781: server process was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Maksim Karaba <Maksim_Karaba(at)epam(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #14781: server process was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault
Date: 2017-08-16 15:10:00
Message-ID: 24096.1502896200@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Maksim Karaba <Maksim_Karaba(at)epam(dot)com> writes:
> We added logging to the function and found out that the error always occurs on the same update
> (in attachments)
> Plan explain verbose in attachments

The point of my questions was that it's going to be difficult for anyone
to fix this unless we can reproduce the problem. What you've provided
doesn't even begin to make that possible. Please see the advice about
providing self-contained test cases at
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/bug-reporting.html

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Maksim Karaba 2017-08-16 15:45:35 Re: BUG #14781: server process was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault
Previous Message Maksim Karaba 2017-08-16 15:01:36 Re: BUG #14781: server process was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault