| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_autovacuum integration attempt #2 |
| Date: | 2004-07-12 14:35:35 |
| Message-ID: | 24090.1089642935@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> The autovacuum process still uses libpq to send its queries, which is
> not the idea behind backend integration.
Sure, but one step at a time. Getting it auto-launched from the
postmaster is already a good increment in usability, and offhand
I don't see that there's any part of that work that we'd have to
throw away later.
(This is not to say that I like the patch; I haven't reviewed it yet.
But I don't want to reject it just because it's not the final form
of autovacuum.)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-07-12 14:35:54 | Re: add missing options to pg_dumpall |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-07-12 14:31:16 | Re: plperl fixes |