Re: top-level DML under CTEs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: top-level DML under CTEs
Date: 2010-10-16 00:00:04
Message-ID: 24086.1287187204@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> 2010/10/5 Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>:
>> This patch conflicted with Tom's WITH .. INSERT change. I tweaked the
>> patch just a bit and it now passes all regression tests so I can review
>> it. New version attached for documentation purposes.

> Thank you, I didn't notice that commit. In your last patch, the
> snippet to add errhint() and ref/insert sgml is unnecessary since it
> was for INSERT ... VALUES fix.

Committed with minor fixes (mostly documentation improvements).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-10-16 00:10:42 Re: knngist - 0.8
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-10-15 23:49:01 Re: knngist - 0.8