From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | michalalbrycht(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #16840: Rows not found in table partitioned by hash when not all partitions exists |
Date: | 2021-01-27 18:08:34 |
Message-ID: | 2407555.1611770914@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> CREATE TABLE dir (
> id SERIAL,
> volume_id BIGINT,
> path TEXT
> ) PARTITION BY HASH (volume_id);
> CREATE TABLE dir_part_2 PARTITION OF dir FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3,
> remainder 2);
> SELECT * FROM dir WHERE volume_id=1 AND (path='abc' OR path='def') --
> returns 0 rows - NOT OK!
Hmm, seems to be a case of faulty partition exclusion, because the
plan isn't scanning anything:
=# explain SELECT * FROM dir WHERE volume_id=1 AND (path='abc' OR path='def');
QUERY PLAN
------------------------------------------
Result (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=0)
One-Time Filter: false
(2 rows)
Probably the reason we'd not noticed is that an incomplete set of
hash partitions isn't a very useful situation: if you don't
populate all of the partitions, you risk unexpected insertion
failures, since you really shouldn't be assuming which partition
any given key value will map into. Still, it's clearly a bug.
Thanks for the report!
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2021-01-27 21:57:52 | Re: BUG #16794: BEFORE UPDATE FOR EACH ROW triggers on partitioned tables can break tuple moving UPDATEs |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2021-01-27 17:59:38 | Re: Inconsistent application of [, ...] in documentation |