From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Build sizes vs docs |
Date: | 2009-12-07 20:34:02 |
Message-ID: | 24075.1260218042@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> Came cross this when updating the cvs fix. We declare size requirements as:
> Also check that you have sufficient disk space. You will need about
> 65 MB for the source tree during compilation and about MB for
> the installation directory. An empty database cluster takes about
> 25 MB; databases take about five times the amount of space that a
> flat text file with the same data would take. If you are going to
> run the regression tests you will temporarily need up to an extra
> 90 MB. Use the <command>df</command> command to check free disk
> My source *without* compile is 82 Mb, and with a build in it (linux
> i686) is 110Mb during compilations, rather than 65.
> An empty cluster takes about 33Mb.
> The regression database takes about 132Mb.
> (this is 8.4)
> Should we fix these numbers, or just remove them? They're clearly
> platform dependent, but perhaps there's still a point in including
> them - mainly as hints?
Maybe round them off to an order of magnitude. I think it's useful
to have some idea of the size requirements, even if they change over
time. It wouldn't be a bad idea to say "as of 8.4" or some such, too.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-12-07 20:44:37 | Re: WAL format |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-12-07 20:28:29 | Re: WAL format |