| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Schemas not available for pl/pgsql %TYPE.... |
| Date: | 2002-09-05 00:47:52 |
| Message-ID: | 24075.1031186872@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org> writes:
> ::sigh:: Is it me or does it look like all
> of pl/pgsql is schema un-aware (ie, all of the declarations). -sc
Yeah. The group of routines parse_word, parse_dblword, etc that are
called by the lexer certainly all need work. There are some
definitional issues to think about, too --- plpgsql presently relies on
the number of names to give it some idea of what to look for, and those
rules are probably all toast now. Please come up with a sketch of what
you think the behavior should be before you start hacking code.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-09-05 01:46:36 | Re: Schemas not available for pl/pgsql %TYPE.... |
| Previous Message | Sean Chittenden | 2002-09-05 00:38:00 | Re: Schemas not available for pl/pgsql %TYPE.... |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-09-05 01:01:38 | Re: Open pg_dump issues |
| Previous Message | Larry Rosenman | 2002-09-05 00:41:48 | Re: PL/Perl? |