From: | Alvar Freude <alvar(at)a-blast(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: bytea operator bugs (was Re: [GENERAL] BYTEA, |
Date: | 2002-09-02 00:25:05 |
Message-ID: | 2402390000.1030926305@gnarzelwicht.delirium-arts.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-patches |
Hi,
-- Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
> The attached patch re-enables a bytea right hand argument (as compared
> to a text right hand argument), and enables index usage, for bytea LIKE
> -- e.g.:
>
>
> parts=# explain select * from bombytea where parent_part like '05-05%';
With this, the limits in Bytea indexes are removed? Great!
As far is I followed the discussion, there where some additionsl limits
on bytea indexes (and like); or are they removed with this patch?
I'll try it sometime later and make some performance checks -- in the
hopem that bytea is faster then texts ;-) (at least the base 255 encoding
i can throw out of my application).
Thanks && Ciao
Alvar
--
** Alvar C.H. Freude
** http://alvar.a-blast.org/
**
** http://odem.org/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2002-09-02 01:58:19 | Re: bytea operator bugs (was Re: [GENERAL] BYTEA, indexes |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2002-09-02 00:14:11 | Re: bytea operator bugs (was Re: [GENERAL] BYTEA, indexes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2002-09-02 01:58:19 | Re: bytea operator bugs (was Re: [GENERAL] BYTEA, indexes |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2002-09-02 00:14:11 | Re: bytea operator bugs (was Re: [GENERAL] BYTEA, indexes |