Re: bytea operator bugs (was Re: [GENERAL] BYTEA,

From: Alvar Freude <alvar(at)a-blast(dot)org>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: bytea operator bugs (was Re: [GENERAL] BYTEA,
Date: 2002-09-02 00:25:05
Message-ID: 2402390000.1030926305@gnarzelwicht.delirium-arts.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-patches

Hi,

-- Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:

> The attached patch re-enables a bytea right hand argument (as compared
> to a text right hand argument), and enables index usage, for bytea LIKE
> -- e.g.:
>
>
> parts=# explain select * from bombytea where parent_part like '05-05%';

With this, the limits in Bytea indexes are removed? Great!

As far is I followed the discussion, there where some additionsl limits
on bytea indexes (and like); or are they removed with this patch?

I'll try it sometime later and make some performance checks -- in the
hopem that bytea is faster then texts ;-) (at least the base 255 encoding
i can throw out of my application).

Thanks && Ciao

Alvar

--
** Alvar C.H. Freude
** http://alvar.a-blast.org/
**
** http://odem.org/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2002-09-02 01:58:19 Re: bytea operator bugs (was Re: [GENERAL] BYTEA, indexes
Previous Message Joe Conway 2002-09-02 00:14:11 Re: bytea operator bugs (was Re: [GENERAL] BYTEA, indexes

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2002-09-02 01:58:19 Re: bytea operator bugs (was Re: [GENERAL] BYTEA, indexes
Previous Message Joe Conway 2002-09-02 00:14:11 Re: bytea operator bugs (was Re: [GENERAL] BYTEA, indexes