From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Marc-Olaf Jaschke <marc-olaf(dot)jaschke(at)s24(dot)com>, Postgres-Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5) |
Date: | 2016-03-23 01:02:15 |
Message-ID: | 24020.1458694935@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:51 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> So much for the theory that it's fixed in RHEL7. I now think that the
>> glibc folk actually do not know about this, and have accordingly filed
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320356
> Good plan, but what do we do between now and when they fix it? This
> seems quite bad.
At the moment I think we're still in information-gathering mode.
The upstream reaction to this will be valuable data. In the meantime,
I'd still like to find out which other platforms have similar issues.
I really kinda doubt the upthread report that Ubuntu doesn't have a
comparable problem, for instance, given the lack of any evidence that
this is a known/fixed issue in glibc.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2016-03-23 01:15:09 | Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5) |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-03-23 00:57:05 | Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2016-03-23 01:15:09 | Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5) |
Previous Message | Álvaro Hernández Tortosa | 2016-03-23 01:00:34 | Re: about google summer of code 2016 |