Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Am Dienstag, 26. Februar 2008 schrieb Tom Lane:
>>> Why should it complain more or less than about the SUBSYS.o
>>> files?
>>
>> It has a hard-wired rule not to complain about files named *.o.
> Well, we could name the output file SUBSYS.o if that is not too confusing. :)
Yeah, it probably is. D'Arcy's suggestion of modifying our
CVSROOT/cvsignore file seems better.
regards, tom lane