From: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: valgrind issues on Fedora 28 |
Date: | 2018-11-08 12:07:42 |
Message-ID: | 23c8e539-6777-1793-0939-12e73cb98314@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/6/18 6:51 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 11/6/18 6:35 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> On 2018-Nov-06, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've recently updated to Fedora 28, and in that environment I get
>>> quite a
>>> few new valgrind issues (see the attached log).
>>
>> Hmm, related to
>> https://postgr.es/m/20180220150838.GD18315@e733.localdomain ?
>> Apparently the right answer is to add local suppressions ...
>>
>
> Yep, seems like that. I'll check if the patch proposed by Aleksander
> resolves all the issues reported by valgrind.
>
OK, I propose we add suppressions per the attached patch.
The rules are clearly incomplete, due to dependence on optimization
used. For example now the stack includes __wcsnlen_avx2, but I see it
was __wcsnlen_sse4_1 in Aleksander's report in February.
Not sure what to do about this - maybe we should wildcard this first
frame, to accept all wcsnlen variants. Opinions?
regards
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
add-valgrind-suppressions.patch | text/x-patch | 1.1 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Laurenz Albe | 2018-11-08 12:23:19 | Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes |
Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2018-11-08 12:07:04 | Re: Connection limit doesn't work for superuser |