| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Yuriy Zhuravlev <stalkerg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: About CMake v2 |
| Date: | 2017-02-10 18:31:12 |
| Message-ID: | 23be700e-341b-65ee-231e-282c38013068@iki.fi |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 02/10/2017 08:27 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> For me a killer feature would be if/when we can get to a point where we can
> have something pgxs-style on cmake that also works on windows.
>
> Our homemade Windows build system works OK for postgres, and while ugly it
> is as you say well tested by now. But it doesn't do *anything* to help
> people build extensions on Windows.
Do we need to build PostgreSQL itself using cmake, to achieve that?
Could we write something like pgxs for cmake, only for extensions?
- Heikki
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2017-02-10 18:32:45 | Re: WIP: About CMake v2 |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2017-02-10 18:27:55 | Re: WIP: About CMake v2 |