Re: pg_dump issues

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump issues
Date: 2011-10-03 04:47:18
Message-ID: 23954.1317617238@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> While investigating a client problem I just observed that pg_dump takes
> a surprisingly large amount of time to dump a schema with a large number
> of views. The client's hardware is quite spiffy, and yet pg_dump is
> taking many minutes to dump a schema with some 35,000 views. Here's a
> simple test case:

> create schema views;
> do 'begin for i in 1 .. 10000 loop execute $$create view views.v_$$
> || i ||$$ as select current_date as d, current_timestamp as ts,
> $_$a$_$::text || n as t, n from generate_series(1,5) as n$$; end
> loop; end;';

> On my modest hardware this database took 4m18.864s for pg_dump to run.

It takes about that on my machine too ... with --enable-cassert.
oprofile said that 90% of the runtime was going into AllocSetCheck,
so I rebuilt without cassert, and the runtime dropped to 16 seconds.
What were you testing?

(Without cassert, it looks like LockReassignCurrentOwner is the next
biggest time sink; I'm wondering if there's some sort of O(N^2) behavior
in there.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2011-10-03 05:23:25 Re: bug of recovery?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-10-03 02:40:33 Re: Should we get rid of custom_variable_classes altogether?