Re: [HACKERS] Krb5 & multiple DB connections

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Krb5 & multiple DB connections
Date: 2006-02-09 03:14:44
Message-ID: 23954.1139454884@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
>> I have little idea of how expensive the operations called by
>> pg_krb5_init really are. If they are expensive then it'd probably
>> make sense to keep the current static variables but treat 'em as a
>> one-element cache, ie, recompute if a new user name is being demanded.
>> If not, we ought to be able to simplify some things.

> We'd have to recompute based on the KRB5CCNAME environment variable
> changing, which is certainly an option. It's not necessairly the case
> that the username is changing, possibly just the cache.

Hm, apparently I completely misunderstand the problem here. What I
thought the bug was was that the cache wasn't recomputed given an
attempt to connect as a different Postgres username than the first
time. If that's not the issue, then what is?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-02-09 03:45:26 Re: Upcoming re-releases
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2006-02-09 03:03:34 Re: [HACKERS] Krb5 & multiple DB connections

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-02-09 03:41:44 Re: [PATCHES] date overflows
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2006-02-09 03:03:34 Re: [HACKERS] Krb5 & multiple DB connections