From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Ignoring entries generated by autoconf in code tree |
Date: | 2015-03-30 20:50:14 |
Message-ID: | 23950.1427748614@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On 3/25/15 10:34 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> When running autoconf from the root tree, autom4te.cache/ is
>>> automatically generated.
>>> Wouldn't it make sense to add an entry in .gitignore for that?
>> Personally, I don't want such a thing, as then I would tend to forget
>> to remove that cache file. And you do want to remove it. autoconf
>> goes pretty berserk if the cache file hangs around across significant
>> changes to configure.in, such as if you were to switch branches.
>> (Or at least that used to be true --- last time I got burnt by it
>> was quite some time ago, but possibly that's just because I'm careful
>> about removing the cache file.)
> I think you might be confusing it with config.cache?
No, I've never used config.cache. I'm not actually sure what autoconf
keeps in autom4te.cache/, but I've definitely seen it generate wacko
output files when that directory still has contents from a previous
run with some other version of the input files.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2015-03-30 22:23:46 | Re: Vacuuming big btree indexes without pages with deleted items |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2015-03-30 20:44:42 | Re: Ignoring entries generated by autoconf in code tree |