From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] force_parallel_mode and GUC categories |
Date: | 2021-05-08 16:39:33 |
Message-ID: | 239283.1620491973@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> writes:
> ...but, I realized just now that *zero* other GUCs use "REPLICATION".
> And the documentation puts it in 20.6.1. Sending Servers,
> so it still seems to me that this is correct to move this, too.
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/runtime-config-replication.html
> Then, I wonder if REPLICATION should be removed from guc_tables.h...
For the archives' sake --- these things are now committed as part of
a55a98477. I'd forgotten this thread, and then rediscovered the same
inconsistencies as Justin had while reviewing Bharath Rupireddy's patch
for bug #16997 [1].
I think this thread can now be closed off as done. However, there
are some open issues mentioned in the other thread, if anyone here
wants to comment.
regards, tom lane
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/16997-ff16127f6e0d1390%40postgresql.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Noah Misch | 2021-05-08 16:55:07 | Re: Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender |
Previous Message | Erik Rijkers | 2021-05-08 16:08:51 | Re: JSON doc example (matchiness) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Semen Yefimenko | 2021-05-10 11:14:40 | Re: Very slow Query compared to Oracle / SQL - Server |
Previous Message | Semen Yefimenko | 2021-05-08 12:06:11 | Re: Very slow Query compared to Oracle / SQL - Server |