From: | Sylvain Cuaz <sylvain(at)ilm-informatique(dot)fr> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Restoring only a subset of schemas |
Date: | 2025-03-19 08:24:05 |
Message-ID: | 238e8c2a-b202-41b4-92e9-c0dbc4700c26@ilm-informatique.fr |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Le 17/03/2025 à 16:29, Tom Lane a écrit :
> Sylvain Cuaz <sylvain(at)ilm-informatique(dot)fr> writes:
>> Now if I want to restore from a full dump of this DB, but with only one "cXXX" and the "Common"
>> schema :
>> - if I pass --create --schema=Common, then the CREATE SCHEMA is missing, i.e. it only emits data
>> inside "Common" and the restore fails.
>> - if I could pass --create --exclude-schema='c*' (fictional notation as patterns are only recognized
>> by pg_dump), then all schemas would be created, with no data inside except for "Common". Creating
>> all schemas is a waste of time, but more importantly would make restoring other schemas more
>> difficult (e.g. rows should be inserted before creating foreign keys).
> In general, the solution for edge-case restore selection needs is to
> make a list of the dump's contents with "pg_restore -l", edit out what
> you don't want using any method you like, then use the edited list with
> "pg_restore -L".
Hi,
I am aware of that feature, but that forces me to know every type of entry that pertains to a
schema or database (e.g. DEFAULT ACL, ACL, COMMENT, DATABASE PROPERTIES, etc.) and what about new
ones that will be added in the future ?
Further, I don't see how it's an edge-case, at the core I just want to restore some but not all the
schemas. This is possible for pg_dump, see my response to Adrian Klaver.
> While I'd be in favor of improving pg_restore to accept wild-card
> patterns,
That would definitely be appreciated.
> I'm very hesitant to start inventing new kinds of selection
> switches for it. The interactions between such switches would be a
> mess.
Which interactions ? It seems to me that the name of the schema should be used as the namespace to
check in _tocEntryRequired() in pg_backup_archiver.c, and then the dependent entries (e.g. ACL,
COMMENT) would be handled around line 3050. I've attached a patch with some pseudo-code. In fact,
were it not for compatibility, I'd argue that my proposed options should be the default, at least
with --create, so as to neither output invalid SQL (for -n) nor extra unwanted ones (for -N) and to
behave like pg_dump.
Cheers,
Sylvain
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
pg_backup_archiver.patch | text/x-patch | 1.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sebastien Flaesch | 2025-03-19 08:39:54 | Re: pgvector as standard PostgreSQL feature? |
Previous Message | Christophe Pettus | 2025-03-19 08:19:20 | Re: pgvector as standard PostgreSQL feature? |