Re: [HACKERS] SAVEPOINT syntax again

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>, Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SAVEPOINT syntax again
Date: 2004-08-12 03:34:13
Message-ID: 23872.1092281653@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Are we ever going to use "RELEASE" for prepared statements? If so
> making SAVEPOINT optional might be a bad idea.

No, why would we? Their verb is DEALLOCATE.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-08-12 03:49:59 Re: dollar-quoting in psql and in general
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-08-12 03:27:49 Re: dollar-quoting in psql and in general

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-08-12 04:25:54 Re: 8.0 Beta 1 // Environment Vars // .pgpass
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-08-12 03:27:14 Re: pg_dump 'die_on_errors'