Re: regresssion script hole

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: regresssion script hole
Date: 2006-06-18 21:39:01
Message-ID: 23852.1150666741@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> The problem is that if the postmaster takes more than 60 seconds to
> start listening (as is apparently happening on spoonbill - don't yet
> know why) this code falls through.

If the postmaster takes that long to start listening, I'd say we need to
fix the postmaster not pg_regress.

> I'm inclined to run the psql test one more time to make sure we can
> actually connect, and if not then fail at this point.

How does that differ from just iterating the loop one more time?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-06-18 22:03:13 Re: regresssion script hole
Previous Message paolo romano 2006-06-18 21:35:25 Re: MultiXacts & WAL