From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: bug in PG_VERSION_NUM patch |
Date: | 2006-02-28 22:29:08 |
Message-ID: | 2385.1141165748@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> OK, I reread the manual page:
> As each input record is read, gawk splits the record into
> fields, using the value of the FS variable as the field
> separator. If FS is a single character, fields are sepa-
> rated by that character. If FS is the null string, then
> each individual character becomes a separate field. Oth-
> erwise, FS is expected to be a full regular expression.
Hpmh. The HPUX man page for plain awk says
-F fs Specify regular expression used to separate
fields. The default is to recognize space and tab
characters, and to discard leading spaces and
tabs. If the -F option is used, leading input
field separators are no longer discarded.
which makes me think we are treading on mighty thin ice here --- there
are lots of different versions of awk around, and some of them are
probably going to treat -F '.' as a regexp.
I'd suggest splitting the input with something more standardized.
Perhaps
sed 's/\./ /g' | $AWK '{printf ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-02-28 22:33:45 | Re: bug in PG_VERSION_NUM patch |
Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2006-02-28 22:10:52 | Re: Automatic free space map filling |