From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: RC2 and open issues |
Date: | 2004-12-21 04:05:36 |
Message-ID: | 2385.1103601936@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I am confused. If we change the percentage to be X% of the entire
> buffer cache, and we set it to 1%, and we exit when either the dirty
> pages or % are reached, don't we end up just scanning the first 1% of
> the cache over and over again?
Exactly. But 1% would be uselessly small with this definition. Offhand
I'd think something like 50% might be a starting point; maybe even more.
What that says is that a page isn't a candidate to be written out by the
bgwriter until it's fallen halfway down the LRU list.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-12-21 04:09:28 | Re: RC2 and open issues |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-12-21 04:00:31 | Re: RC2 and open issues |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-12-21 04:09:28 | Re: RC2 and open issues |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-12-21 01:01:49 | Re: plperl: enable UTF-8 support |