Re: Two different methods of sneaking non-immutable data into an index

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Two different methods of sneaking non-immutable data into an index
Date: 2010-08-05 17:28:41
Message-ID: 23848.1281029321@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> writes:
> mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com (Merlin Moncure) writes:
>> yeah -- perhaps you shouldn't be allowed set things like datestyle in
>> functions then.

> That would cause grief for Slony-I, methinks, and probably other things
> that behave somewhat similar.

Yeah, it's not really practical (or useful IMO) to try to lock this down
completely.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2010-08-05 17:30:19 Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2010-08-05 17:26:32 Re: Two different methods of sneaking non-immutable data into an index