Re: Foreign key wierdness

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Didier Moens <Didier(dot)Moens(at)dmb001(dot)rug(dot)ac(dot)be>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Foreign key wierdness
Date: 2003-01-22 20:30:10
Message-ID: 23829.1043267410@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Didier Moens <Didier(dot)Moens(at)dmb001(dot)rug(dot)ac(dot)be> writes:
> I did some extensive testing using PostgreSQL 7.3.1 (logs and results
> available upon request), and the massive slowdown is NOT related to
> qualified tablename syntax or (lack of) VACUUM ANALYZE, but to the
> following change :

> pgAdminII 1.4.2 :
> -------------------
> CREATE TABLE articles (
> article_id integer DEFAULT
> nextval('"articles_article_id_key"'::text) NOT NULL,
> ...

> pgAdminII 1.4.12 :
> --------------------
> CREATE TABLE articles (
> article_id bigint DEFAULT nextval('"articles_article_id_key"'::text)
> NOT NULL,
> ...

Ah-hah, and I'll bet that the column being linked to this one by the
foreign key constraint is still an integer?

> With two tables each containing some 20.000 entries, the fk creation
> time between both of them increases from ~ 1.8 secs to ~ 221 secs.

Seems odd that the cost would get *that* much worse. Maybe we need to
look at whether the FK checking queries need to include explicit casts
...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Curtis Faith 2003-01-22 20:38:33 Re: Windows Build System
Previous Message D. Hageman 2003-01-22 20:17:03 Namespace/Table Visibility Behavior Issues