Re: Invalid length of startup packet

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Ron Snyder <snyder(at)roguewave(dot)com>, "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk>, "'Henrik Steffen'" <steffen(at)city-map(dot)de>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Invalid length of startup packet
Date: 2002-05-29 15:56:20
Message-ID: 23824.1022687780@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> In addition I would suggest that these two messages are also
> printed before the first real elog() output occurs, if that
> flag is turned off.

Uh, what do you mean by "real elog() output"? In any case, there is
not a lot of choice about the placement of these messages AFAICS.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Remi 2002-05-29 19:49:19 Error class not found
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-05-29 15:52:51 Re: How to cripple a postgres server